The –amend option is used with the ` git commit` command to rewrite the git history. The user requires to rewrite the git history to change the older or newer commit of the repository. Sometimes the user needs to change the committed message before or after publishing the repository. These functions allow you to access MySQL database servers.The ` git commit` command is used to confirm any changes done in the repository, and the git keeps the history of each committed task. Instead, either theįor further help while choosing a MySQL API.
#GITHUB DESKTOP REBASE CODE#
This extension is deprecated as of PHP 5.5.0, and is not recommended for writing new code as it will be removed in the future. That's why we need an index mapping for every search key in secondary index which is dense index.
That can only be achieved if the files are in order. Main point of keeping a sparse index is that we should be able to find out the other search keys with the help of it. We can skip the mappings that are included in that block.įor Primary index, we can have a dense or sparse index.īut for secondary index, it is essential to have dense index as the data entries are not in a sequential order for the secondary index. When we are reading an entry from the storage, we take the entire block and go through it. Sparse Index: contains index records for only some search-key values.įor Sparse index, a good tradeoff would be keeping an index entry for every block in file. Secondary index: an index whose search key specifies an order different from the sequential order of the file.ĭense index: Index record appears for every search-key value in the file. Primary index: in a sequentially ordered file, the index whose search key specifies the sequential order of the file In RDBMS, primary index can be dense or sparse. We're ending up feeling like probably Github Desktop isn't a good fit for us - I've personally switched to GitKraken, and a lot of us are using the command line more. In the second case, seeing the commits that came in with a merge only We think pull requests are amazing and very useful for understanding In the first case, it's most useful to see which pull requests haveīeen merged—not the individual commits that make up that pull request. In this model, mergesĪlmost always represent either (1) a branch getting merged into theĭefault branch via a pull request or (2) a branch being updated from "GitHub Desktop is optimized for GitHub Flow. Here's some of the rational behind why we do this that a developer of Currently there isn't a way to change this
Hidden due to the -first-parent flag that we use when showing the Here's a comment I got in email from the Github Desktop team:ĭigging into this further, it does look like the commits are being The original commits are not lost, but aren't visible.Ģ) The way Github Desktop is displaying the log is showing the merge commits but not showing the original commit. So my question is: is there any way to prevent the loss of Developer A's commit message?ġ) our developers aren't always doing a pull before committing, resulting in merge commits. That seems to fit with the fact that this merge commit issue is much worse than it used to be.) (It's hard to find up-to-date info on what the "Sync" button in Github Desktop is doing, exactly, but I did findĪnd then changed. It seems like this behavior has changed somewhat - it used to happen very rarely, and now seems to happen all the time. The merge commit contains all of Developer A's changes, but Developer A's lovely messages are gone. We frequently have the following situation:ĭeveloper A commits a bunch of updates with lovely explanatory messages.ĭeveloper B has been working in the same branch and makes a commit afterwards, with a message.ĭeveloper B's commit with the message shows up in the git log, and following it, we get a merge commit from Developer B, with an automatic message "merge branch. We are using Github Desktop (formerly Github for Windows) as our Git client.
0 kommentar(er)
